Windustry Forum
Wind Farmers Network    Wind Farmers Network Forum  Hop To Forum Categories  General Items  Hop To Forums  Expert Q & A    December's Featured Expert: Trudy Forsyth, Small Wind Turbines
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Administrator
Windbag
Picture of Brian Antonich
Posted Hide Post
Brian Antonich

Brian Antonich

Minneapolis, MN

Hi Trudy. When determining if you have enough wind to put up a small wind turbine, how much and what types of wind data are most useful?  Do you know where one can find useful wind resource data with out spending a lot of money?  How much wind is not enough, just enough, or more than enough to have a successful small wind project?

Brian,

If you can find it, time series data from a location near you is the most useful.  However for small wind turbines (10 kW or less) you can get by with the on-line wind maps.   When using the wind maps, be advised that they assume a well-exposed site.

I recommend starting with the on-line wind maps available at:

http://www.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/windpoweringamerica/wind_maps.asp

There is also an interactive zoom wind atlas of the western U.S. at:

http://www.energyatlas.org/

A number of other websites provide wind speed data:

The US Renewable Resource Data Center provides information on wind data at http://rredc.nrel.gov/wind.

The University of North Dakota Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) has time series data for the upper Midwest and the northern & central plains. 

http://www.undeerc.org/wind/

The website www.weatherbase.com provides monthly average wind speed data for many cities around the world.

The Windustry website maintains a list of US wind data resources at www.windustry.com/resources/windmaps.htm.

The US National Climatic Data Center provides monthly average wind speed data for many US cities at www.ncdc.noaa.gov/ol/climate/online/ccd/avgwind.html. To convert from mph to m/s, divide by 2.25.

A handful of states have databases of time series data.

You can also check with the nearest airport.  Due to their location in sheltered areas and to generally poor anemometer placement, airport data generally gives a low-ball estimate of the wind resource.

Finally, Mick Sagrillo has written an excellent article on site analysis that includes home brew methods for estimating the wind resource at a specific site.  The article is at

www.homepower.com/files/windsiteanalysis.pdf

As to how much wind is necessary for a small wind project that depends mainly on the type of project, and how important financial performance is to you.  What follows are some very rough rules of thumb. 

For off-grid projects, where your alternative is a grid extension, a wind turbine could be economically added to a hybrid renewable energy system in areas with average wind speeds as low as 8.5 mph @ 20 meters above ground level (AGL) (High Class 1).

For an on-grid system, a site with a minimum average wind speed of ~10 mph at 20 meters AGL (Class 2 or better) is worth further study.  If financial performance is important, you probably want a minimum average wind speed of 12 mph at 20 meters AGL. (Class 3 or better)

************************************************

Michael Weber

Minneapolis, MN

Could you define what "small wind " means in terms of kW capacity? Also, how would a small school board or rural county in MN get started on developing a wind project--please address financing issues as well.

Michael,

Small wind turbines are defined, somewhat arbitrarily to be turbines equal to 100 kW or less.

My recommendation for getting school board or rural county to consider using a turbine for their school would be to research what has already been done.  Through our Wind Powering America projects, we think that working with schools is an ideal way to get information out within rural communities.  We have worked with Michael Arquin www.kidwind.org to develop standards based science curriculum for middle and high school science teachers.

We have seen several schools in Iowa use wind energy to help displace the use of electricity and in one case provide an opportunity to fund classroom computers. 

The best source for you would be to work with Windustry, they have been working on the use of turbines in a ‘community wind’ model that has specific financing strategies and since they are located in Minnesota they will be very knowledgeable about existing policy and strategies.   I would defer to them and ask them about specific financing opportunities.  They are holding their next Community Wind Conference in Iowa the beginning of March, which would present you another opportunity to learn about wind and schools.  To find out more about the conference and to register visit http://www.windustry.org/conferences/march2006/default.htm

You can find an article on the Spirit Lake school project at: http://www.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/windpoweringamerica/docs/schools.doc. 

Here is a link to a presentation given by Tom Wind of Iowa at last year’s Wind Powering America state summit meeting.

http://www.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/windpoweringamerica/pdfs/workshops/2005_summit/wind.pdf

************************************************

Mike Jacobs

West Concord, MA

Over the years, there have been a couple small wind turbine manufacturers that have stayed visible and active in the market, and many more that have made an attempt to sell small (under 12 KW) wind turbines but not made a successful business.  In your view, is the challenge one of engineering and production, or of adapting to the business conditions?

Mike,

The small wind business is fraught with business and technical challenges.  One example would be the Carter administration tax credits that did a lot to stimulate the use of consumer-owned renewables.  While these tax credits were in place there were about 35 small turbine manufacturers in business but once the tax credit policy expired, it created a very challenging business environment for small turbine manufacturers and consequently only about 3 companies are in business today, Bergey Windpower, Wind Turbine Industries (Jacob’s turbines) and then Southwest Windpower (This was a company that started in the early 90s and so they weren’t around during the Carter tax credits.).

So policies dramatically effect the small wind business and when they decline the US market nearly vaporizes.  Starting in 1998 in California, there began to again be good incentive policies for small wind turbines and now there are numerous states and utilities that offer compelling incentives for small wind.

At the same time, the small wind manufacturers have the challenges that all small businesses have, making payroll.  It is very, very difficult if you are manufacturing any product and from month to month you may sell no products or many products. With that type of business environment, how do you stay in business?  The answer for Bergey Windpower was to sell their turbines outside the US after the expiration of the federal tax credits.  The other part of the equation is to continue to improve your product through incremental engineering, while this is possible on some levels, when cash flow is a problem you can only do low risk, low cost improvements.

At this point, there are a number of small turbine designers who have good designs and are trying to get into the marketplace.  The Department of Energy has helped them through their cost-shared competitive procurements.  Those companies selected have worked to develop their designs and move toward the market by manufacturing turbines.  Bringing a small turbine to market is a huge financial, engineering, and manufacturing challenge.  There are other inventers who have been trying to do this on their own without government funding or assistance, creating even more of a challenge.

************************************************

Nick Nichols
La Crosse, WI 

Even though plug-ins are not quite here yet, it's my understanding that they will be soon. My wife and I like to be on the cutting edge of sustainability.  How big of a turbine do I need to recharge a plug-in hybrid overnight?

Facts & Assumptions 

Size of battery bank (2004 Prius): 1.3 kWh  (6.5 Ahrs @ 201.6 volts)

Assume 30 miles per day

Assume 0.3 kWh/mile

(from Calcars fact sheet www.calcars.org/priusplusfactsheet-v1.12.pdf)

Wind Resource at/near La Crosse: 10 –12 mph @ 30 meters (Wisconsin Wind Map)

Assuming you could plug in a standard Prius (you can’t), and assuming the car is plugged in overnight for 12 hours per day, you would need your wind turbine to generate 1.3 kWh while the car is plugged in, which is equivalent to 2.6 kWh per day.  (This implicitly assumes that the wind resource is constant over the day.  This is usually a bad assumption, but I make it so that I can continue the analysis).  Given the wind resource at La Crosse, a small wind turbine in a well-exposed location will have a capacity factor on the order of 15%.  This means that the wind turbine average production will be (very) approximately equal to 15% of its rated power.  So, your desired wind turbine size is: 

          2.6 kWh/day / 24 hrs/day / 0.15 = ~ 0.7 kW.

So you would want a 0.7 kW wind turbine.  Of course due to fluctuating winds, some nights the turbine would produce more energy than is needed, other nights, less.  The turbine would also produce an average of 0.7 kWh electricity during times the car is not plugged in for use for other purposes.

To continue the analysis, lets assume you drive 30 miles per day.  To go all-electric you would need a battery bank storage capacity of 9 kWh (0.3 kWh/mile x 30 miles).  In this scenario you would need a wind turbine to produce 18 kWh/day, leading to a turbine size of:

          18 kWh/day/24 hrs/day/0.15 = ~ 5 kW.

There are aftermarket kits in development for the Prius that include an external plug and a larger capacity battery bank.

One last note.  It would be wise to ensure that the wind turbine electricity could be used by another load, such as your house.  This gives you a use for the electricity produced by the turbine while the car is not plugged in or after the car’s battery bank has been fully charged.

************************************************

Phil Schmidt

Trinity Products, Inc.

Ofallon, MO

I am a monopole fabricator for small wind.  I have heard the word "harmonics" a few times in regards to monopoles.  Can you explain what it is and how to prevent it? Also, I have programs designed for fabricating billboards, sign poles, and cell towers.  They take in account for the square foot area of the face of the signage which then sizes the tower.  How can I use this program to size the towers for turbines?  Or, turbine blades vs. a fixed 10' x 10' billboard lets say.

         Thank you.

Phil,

Small turbines operate in a variable speed mode and through their normal operation they may hit resonances or vibrations that can cause problems for the structural support including the tower and foundation.  Your monopole tower would need to avoid the resonant frequencies that turbines operate through and those frequencies will vary from turbine to turbine.

I’m not sure how to relate a sign and it’s size to the operation of small turbines, I’m sorry I can’t help you further.  If you are interested in working with a specific turbine, I’d advise that you contact the manufacturer and see if they are interested in working with you as a tower fabricator.  

************************************************

Malcolm Brown

Hull, MA 

Preamble.  There are five sites, four of them on or near Cape Cod, where a machine like a 50KW Bergey or a 30 KW Fuhrlaender would seem nicely load-matched to the following load: the WBUR or WGBH nationally-syndicated public radio stations – their repeater transmitters – or the primary transmitter of WOMR-FM in Provincetown.

The fifth site is more interesting in my humble opinion (an NPR station I co-founded personally).  It’s in the Catskill Mountains , WJFF by name.  A 30KW Fuhrlander would suffice to power its primary transmitter, on a mountaintop in Liberty, NY.

Qu. 1:  Any chance you at NREL, -- or my friends at Windustry, like Lisa or Wes -- might help me do small wind at 3 or more of these sites ‘down East’?  Also, is there any chance one of them on a “to be performance tested” basis, where lots could be learned?   I could get guarantees that none of these broadcasters would prematurely go on-air with capacity-factors or other pieces of info that’d be all-too-revealing if put out prematurely.

Qu. 2:  are there now, -- or will there be by the end of 2006 – other good competitors in the 30-50KW range, -- some perhaps with monopole tower design, -- that any of these 5 sites should consider, perhaps ahead of both Furhlaender and Bergey?

Malcolm,

Thanks for your interest in working with NREL on your radio transmitter projects.  While DOE/NREL have sent out competitive Requests-for-Proposals in the past to work with ‘host sites’ in setting up turbines and evaluating their performance, there are no such projects planned in the future.  (As you may know, the federal budget for wind research has been severely cut through Congressional ‘earmarks’.)

With that said, I know that the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative (MTC) works with renewable projects in MA and they may have interest in funding or co-funding such projects.  I know that in March of 2005, they started an incentive program for turbines 10 kW and under.  They may be willing to entertain your idea, which incidentally sounds like a good one to me.

My other thought would be to apply for a 25% grant off of the turbine system through the US Department of Agriculture.  You need to be an agricultural producer with at least 50% of your income from your agricultural product or a small rural business to apply.  It is a competitive application process and the grant requirements have recently changed.  I may at the MTC on March 10th to work with farmers and the USDA on these grants.  Let me know off line if you’d like contact information for this meeting.

Your second question, there are some other products in the marketplace in this size range, the Entegrity 15, a 50 kW turbine being sold through www.entegritywind.com.  I have heard that there are Cygnus turbines that are 30/50 kW depending on whether you want single or three phase turbines. http://www.cygnuswind.com/  There are also used, refurbished turbines on the market, one company is EMS in Gary South Dakota, www.energyms.com.  I’m sure there are other companies out there refurbishing turbines too.  Please do your research carefully, while refurbished turbines offer very competitive prices you want to ensure that you are getting good products.  Other than these turbine and the others you’ve already mentioned, I can’t think of any other turbine products on the market or soon to be on the market.

There

Good luck with your project.

************************************************

Glen Jacobsen

Bird Island, MN

and

Christina Hettig

Olivia, MN

I have a perfect spot for a small (40 kw) generator for my home and to sell the excess.  I have an anemometer up and running, I have done a bit of research and have an idea on which windmill I will put up, unless something new and better comes along.

Problem is the $60,000+ to start out....

Where can I get a grant, or other free money, to help start out?  Or are there other programs, demos, trials, etc out there?  I have a perfect site in an area ripe for small farm development but need access to assistance to get going.

Glen and Christina,

There is state based incentives that you can find out more information about through Windustry or www.dsireusa.org.  And there is the USDA Title 9006 Farm Bill, which incents the use of renewables for agricultural producers or rural small businesses.  You can find out more information from their web site http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rd/farmbill2002.html.  Other than state incentives, US Farm bill, there is net metering in Minnesota but the rated capacity of your wind turbine system must be less than 40 kW.  Minnesota is unique throughout the US in that you are offered average retail rate for your excess kWhs (between 6-7 cents/kWh), this is marvelous because most of the US offers the avoided or wholesale cost valued between 1 and 3 cents/kWh.

The other thing to keep in mind is that there is beginning to be a market for the renewable energy credits, called RECs or green tags.  Where marketing entities will pay you a fixed amount for the kWhs that your turbine produces that don’t produce pollution.  Windustry would be the best organization for you to contact about all of these funding opportunities.  They often have meetings, conferences and workshops that are set up to help people like you find funding sources.

 
Posts: 113 | Location: Minneapolis, MN | Registered: 16 September 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Administrator
Windbag
Picture of Brian Antonich
Posted Hide Post
Shuman Moore

Shuman Moore 

        Can you please provide me a list of suppliers and general pricing for the range of 10kW thru 500 kW wind turbine generators?

Shuman,

Below is a list of manufacturers and the turbine sizes they manufacture:

Domestic

Bergey   (1 kW, 10 kW): www.bergey.com

Southwest Wind Power (0.4 kW, 0.9 kW, 1.0 kW, 3 kW): www.windenergy.com

Aeromax (0.9 kW): www.aeromaxenergy.com

Jacobs (20 kW): www.windturbine.net

Entegrity (50 kW): www.entegritywind.com

EMS (refurbished turbines) (35 kW, 65 kW): www.energyms.com  

Imports

Kestrel (0.6 kW, 0.8 kW, 1 kW, 2.5 kW): www.kestrelwind.co.za

Proven (0.6 kW, 2.5 kW, 6 kW, 15 kW): www.provenenergy.co.uk

Fuhrlander (30 kW, 100 kW, 250 kW): www.lorax-energy.com

Installed costs generally range as follows:

1 – 10 kW: $4,000/kW - $6,000/kW

> 10 kW – 100 kW    (new): $2,000/kW - $4,000/kW

                             (used/refurbished): $1,000/kW – 2,000/kW

100 kW – 600 kW: ~ $2,000/kW

Some manufacturers sell direct, others sell through dealers, and some do both. 

In addition to EMS, there are several very small companies that sell refurbished turbines in the 50 kW – 500 kW range.  If you go this route, do your homework.

It’s generally straightforward to get pricing on the equipment.  What is somewhat squishy are the balance of system costs and installation.  For the smaller turbines, 10 kW and smaller, tower height and type are big variables.  Guyed towers are the least expensive, while free standing towers are significantly more expensive.

************************************************

Ray

Minneapolis, MN  

Is it possible, in Minnesota 's Southwest market, to Profit $100,000 in a year with small wind? I would like to buy a foreclosed house, put up an economical wind tower and have it pay for itself in a year. Are there any models of this available? What is the best wind turbine for the under $100,000 market? Also, are there any problems with wind turbines in residential areas?

Ray,

The short answer is “no”.  Most commercial wind projects (using more cost effective MW scale machines) have a payback period of 5-10 years (for those that can use the production tax credit (PTC)) or 10-15 years (for those that can’t use the PTC).  A one-year payback, especially with a small machine, is unrealistic.  Let’s look at an example.

Example: Net metered 35 kW system

Minnesota’s net metering law is interesting in that it mandates that net metered systems receive retail rate even for net-excess electricity for systems up to 40 kW.  So in principle, you could install a wind turbine up to 40 kW in size and sell all the energy to the utility at the retail rate.  In practice I could see the utility having heartburn if you did this.  For arguments sake, lets assume the utility allows you to proceed and that the retail rate is $0.07/kWh.

Assumptions:

Wind turbine size: 35 kW  (assume an E15 on a 25 meter tower)

Installed cost: $80,000

Lifetime: 20 years

Operation & Maintenance (O&M): $0.01/kWh (I consider this optimistic)

Wind Resource: Average wind speed 7.7 m/s @ 50 meters AGL è 6.9 m/s at 25 meters

          (this would be among the best sites on Buffalo Ridge)

Retail Electricity Rate: $0.07/kWh

Annual production: ~ 110,000 kWh per year

Annual Net Income: 110,000 kWh x ($0.07/kWh - $0.06$/kWh) = $6,600

So, even with several optimistic assumptions, you get about $6600 per year for an investment of $80,000. 

The best wind turbine for under $100,000 depends upon what you are trying to do.  See my answer to Shuman Moore’s question for a list of available machines.

There are many problems with turbines in residential areas. Many built-up areas have a 35-foot height restriction on towers.  This leads to reduced production due to the lower wind resource closer to the ground, and increased operations and maintenance due to the turbulence caused by nearby trees and houses.  One small wind turbine manufacturer recommends a minimum lot size of 1 acre.  This allows for greater exposure to the wind and room to install the tower.

************************************************

Mike Rivard

Minneapolis, MN

Thanks for doing questions!

1) I am interested in having you address the current and emerging vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT) technology, in these contexts: small scale, large scale (>1MW) moderate wind (Class 4), heavy wind (Class 7) remote maritime.

2) If possible, please discuss specific vendors.

3) Do VAWT have significant advantages over horizontal axis machines?

Mike,

I have asked a colleague of mine, Dr. Dale Berg from Sandia National Laboratory to answer your questions.  Historically, the Department of Energy has been involved with two national laboratories on wind research.  Sandia National Laboratory led the research on vertical axis wind turbines or VAWTs and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) led the research on horizontal axis wind turbines or HAWTs.  So Dale is the fellow who knows about VAWTs and he has provided answers for questions 1 and 3.  The second question would take a significant amount of time to answer and we’re just not able to spend the time to do this.

1.  The only interest in this area that I am aware of is a group of folks (one or more) at TU – Delft in the Netherlands, working under Gijs van Kuik on generating wind energy in the "built" (urban) environment.  A grad student named Sander Mertens published a paper on an analytical study of a VAWT in this situation in either the November '04 or November '03 issues of Journal of Solar Energy.  He concluded the VAWT is very well suited because it seems to have the potential of additional energy capture in the upslope wind that you may experience near the edge of a roof.  A company called McKenzie Bay is actively selling an energy supply system they call the WindStor that utilizes a VAWT and a battery to provide power.  I think they claim this can readily be mounted on rooftops, but I'm not sure.  I have not done any searches for roof top power systems or wind turbines, so it's very possible there are other applications like this out there.

3.  Attractions of VAWTs.  They could be considered advantageous for locations with no predominant wind direction, since there is no yaw drive to wear out.  They could be easier to erect in remote sites, since there is no heavy equipment to lift to the top of the tower (The Japanese were very interested in this 10 years ago for installation on mountain ridges where it would be extremely difficult to get heavy cranes).  The base-mounted generator, transmission and electronics are easy to access in inclement weather (very cold climates, etc.)  The Darrieus configuration (egg-beater) and box (straight blade with bottom and top horizonal supports) can readily be built to incorporate blade safety cables to prevent a blade throw in case of blade failure.  Blades could be easier and cheaper to build (more material, but usually constant chord and no twist – early blades were extruded aluminum, and FloWind pultruded their composite blades so the labor costs went way down). 

Comments from Brian Antonich:  That said yaw drives typically do not wear out over the lifetime of larger turbines as yawing of turbines is generally not continuous over the life of the machine.  If the wind changes direction as much as it might cause a yaw drive to wear out it is probably not a good site to place a wind turbine because the site will have a large amount of turbulent air flow that will be rough on both HAWTs and VAWTs alike.  It is the gearbox and bearings of the machine, which experience most of the stress from everyday operations and must be retooled or replaced every so often.  The VAWT is advantageous over the HAWT because the gearbox and bearings are closer to the ground, making them easier to work on.  But much of the advantage from easier maintenance is mitigated by the fact that a wind turbine will produce significantly better if mounted on a tower because wind speed increases with height.

Fatigue is also a major concern for the VAWT because during part of it's revolution there is lift applied to one side of the blade then there is no lift, then lift again.  And this is repeated with every revolution of the machine.  There is also great turbulence caused downwind of the tower, which causes stress on the machine as the blades pass the downwind side of the machine.  These two fatigue issues are major chalenges that VAWTs design engineers must address, making it more challenging to develop a robust machine.

This is not to dissuade people from exploring VAWT options, but these design and engineering issues are the major problems hindering the development of a market for VAWTs. 

************************************************

Tom P. Abeles  

What would make the VAWT's attractive in any market, from small, 1kw units to larger, utility systems?

Will NREL accept turbines from prospective manufacturers for testing and evaluation?

Tom,

The bottom line with any turbine system, vertical axis or horizontal axis, is a reliable turbine system that can produce kWhs efficiently at low cost.

NREL is beginning to accept the idea of bringing in turbines for testing from prospective manufacturers.  Due to the federal budget challenges, we are looking at ways to bring money into the laboratory and provide services that don’t compete with private industry.  At this point, we are just starting this and don’t have specific costs.  Please contact me directly if you would like to talk about this further.

Comments from Brian Antonich: Dealing with the design and engineering issues outlined in the answer to Mike Rivard's question without large increases in manufacturing costs are key to making VAWTs competitive with HAWTs.  There are currently no field tested VAWTs on the market.  If current designs stand up to the rigors of field testing, revealing that they are as reliable as HAWTs, their acceptance into the market will follow.

 

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Brian Antonich,


Brian Antonich
Small Wind Program Analyst
612-870-3465
brian@windustry.org
www.windustry.org
 
Posts: 113 | Location: Minneapolis, MN | Registered: 16 September 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2  
 

Wind Farmers Network    Wind Farmers Network Forum  Hop To Forum Categories  General Items  Hop To Forums  Expert Q & A    December's Featured Expert: Trudy Forsyth, Small Wind Turbines