Wind Farmers Network Forum
General Items
Expert Q & A
December's Featured Expert: Trudy Forsyth, Small Wind Turbines|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Administrator Windbag |
Brian
Antonich Hi
Trudy. When determining if you have enough wind to put up a small wind turbine,
how much and what types of wind data are most useful?
Do you know where one can find useful wind resource data with out
spending a lot of money? How much
wind is not enough, just enough, or more than enough to have a successful small
wind project? Brian, If
you can find it, time series data from a location near you is the most useful.
However for small wind turbines (10 kW or less) you can get by with the
on-line wind maps. When using
the wind maps, be advised that they assume a well-exposed site. I recommend starting with the on-line wind maps available at: http://www.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/windpoweringamerica/wind_maps.asp There
is also an interactive zoom wind atlas of the western U.S. at: A
number of other websites provide wind speed data: The
US Renewable Resource Data Center provides information on wind data at http://rredc.nrel.gov/wind.
The
University of North Dakota Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) has
time series data for the upper The
website www.weatherbase.com provides
monthly average wind speed data for many cities around the world. The
Windustry website maintains a list of The
US National Climatic Data Center provides monthly average wind speed data for
many A
handful of states have databases of time series data. You
can also check with the nearest airport. Due
to their location in sheltered areas and to generally poor anemometer placement,
airport data generally gives a low-ball estimate of the wind resource. Finally,
Mick Sagrillo has written an excellent article on site analysis that includes
home brew methods for estimating the wind resource at a specific site.
The article is at www.homepower.com/files/windsiteanalysis.pdf As
to how much wind is necessary for a small wind project that depends mainly on
the type of project, and how important financial performance is to you.
What follows are some very rough rules of thumb.
For
off-grid projects, where your alternative is a grid extension, a wind turbine
could be economically added to a hybrid renewable energy system in areas with
average wind speeds as low as 8.5 mph @ 20 meters above ground level (AGL) (High
Class 1). For
an on-grid system, a site with a minimum average wind speed of ~10 mph at 20
meters AGL (Class 2 or better) is worth further study.
If financial performance is important, you probably want a minimum
average wind speed of 12 mph at 20 meters AGL. (Class 3 or better)
************************************************ Michael
Weber Could
you define what "small wind " means in terms of kW capacity? Also, how
would a small school board or rural county in MN get started on developing a
wind project--please address financing issues as well. Michael, Small
wind turbines are defined, somewhat arbitrarily to be turbines equal to 100 kW
or less. My
recommendation for getting school board or rural county to consider using a
turbine for their school would be to research what has already been done.
Through our Wind Powering America projects, we think that working with
schools is an ideal way to get information out within rural communities.
We have worked with Michael Arquin www.kidwind.org
to develop standards based science curriculum for middle and high school science
teachers. We
have seen several schools in Iowa use wind energy to
help displace the use of electricity and in one case provide an opportunity to
fund classroom computers. The
best source for you would be to work with Windustry, they have been working on
the use of turbines in a ‘community wind’ model that has specific financing
strategies and since they are located in You
can find an article on the Here
is a link to a presentation given by Tom Wind of http://www.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/windpoweringamerica/pdfs/workshops/2005_summit/wind.pdf ************************************************ Mike
Jacobs West Concord, MA Over
the years, there have been a couple small wind turbine manufacturers that have
stayed visible and active in the market, and many more that have made an attempt
to sell small (under 12 KW) wind turbines but not made a successful business.
In your view, is the challenge one of engineering and production, or of adapting
to the business conditions? Mike, The
small wind business is fraught with business and technical challenges.
One example would be the Carter administration tax credits that did a lot
to stimulate the use of consumer-owned renewables.
While these tax credits were in place there were about 35 small turbine
manufacturers in business but once the tax credit policy expired, it created a
very challenging business environment for small turbine manufacturers and
consequently only about 3 companies are in business today, Bergey Windpower,
Wind Turbine Industries (Jacob’s turbines) and then Southwest Windpower (This
was a company that started in the early 90s and so they weren’t around during
the Carter tax credits.). So
policies dramatically effect the small wind business and when they decline the US market nearly vaporizes.
Starting in 1998 in At the
same time, the small wind manufacturers have the challenges that all small
businesses have, making payroll. It
is very, very difficult if you are manufacturing any product and from month to
month you may sell no products or many products. With that type of business
environment, how do you stay in business? The
answer for Bergey Windpower was to sell their turbines outside the US
after the expiration of the federal tax
credits. The other part of the
equation is to continue to improve your product through incremental engineering,
while this is possible on some levels, when cash flow is a problem you can only
do low risk, low cost improvements. At
this point, there are a number of small turbine designers who have good designs
and are trying to get into the marketplace.
The Department of Energy has helped them through their cost-shared
competitive procurements. Those
companies selected have worked to develop their designs and move toward the
market by manufacturing turbines. Bringing
a small turbine to market is a huge financial, engineering, and manufacturing
challenge. There are other inventers
who have been trying to do this on their own without government funding or
assistance, creating even more of a challenge. ************************************************ Nick
Nichols Even
though plug-ins are not quite here yet, it's my understanding that they will be
soon. My wife and I like to be on the cutting edge of sustainability.
How big of a turbine do I need to recharge a plug-in hybrid overnight? Facts
& Assumptions Size
of battery bank (2004 Prius): 1.3 kWh (6.5
Ahrs @ 201.6 volts) Assume
30 miles per day Assume
0.3 kWh/mile (from
Calcars fact sheet www.calcars.org/priusplusfactsheet-v1.12.pdf) Wind
Resource at/near La Crosse: 10 –12 mph @ 30
meters (Wisconsin Wind Map) Assuming
you could plug in a standard Prius (you can’t), and assuming the car is
plugged in overnight for 12 hours per day, you would need your wind turbine to
generate 1.3 kWh while the car is plugged in, which is equivalent to 2.6 kWh per
day. (This implicitly assumes that
the wind resource is constant over the day.
This is usually a bad assumption, but I make it so that I can continue
the analysis). Given the wind
resource at
2.6 kWh/day / 24 hrs/day / 0.15 = ~ 0.7 kW. So
you would want a 0.7 kW wind turbine. Of
course due to fluctuating winds, some nights the turbine would produce more
energy than is needed, other nights, less. The
turbine would also produce an average of 0.7 kWh electricity during times the
car is not plugged in for use for other purposes. To
continue the analysis, lets assume you drive 30 miles per day.
To go all-electric you would need a battery bank storage capacity of 9
kWh (0.3 kWh/mile x 30 miles). In
this scenario you would need a wind turbine to produce 18 kWh/day, leading to a
turbine size of:
18 kWh/day/24 hrs/day/0.15 = ~ 5 kW. There
are aftermarket kits in development for the Prius that include an external plug
and a larger capacity battery bank. One
last note. It would be wise to
ensure that the wind turbine electricity could be used by another load, such as
your house. This gives you a use for
the electricity produced by the turbine while the car is not plugged in or after
the car’s battery bank has been fully charged. ************************************************ Phil
Schmidt Trinity
Products, Inc. I
am a monopole fabricator for small wind. I
have heard the word "harmonics" a few times in regards to monopoles.
Can you explain what it is and how to prevent it? Also, I have programs
designed for fabricating billboards, sign poles, and cell towers.
They take in account for the square foot area of the face of the signage
which then sizes the tower. How can
I use this program to size the towers for turbines?
Or, turbine blades vs. a fixed 10' x 10' billboard lets say.
Thank
you. Phil, Small
turbines operate in a variable speed mode and through their normal operation
they may hit resonances or vibrations that can cause problems for the structural
support including the tower and foundation.
Your monopole tower would need to avoid the resonant frequencies that
turbines operate through and those frequencies will vary from turbine to
turbine. I’m
not sure how to relate a sign and it’s size to the operation of small
turbines, I’m sorry I can’t help you further.
If you are interested in working with a specific turbine, I’d advise
that you contact the manufacturer and see if they are interested in working with
you as a tower fabricator. ************************************************ Malcolm
Brown Preamble.
There are five sites, four of them on or near Cape Cod, where a machine
like a 50KW Bergey or a 30 KW Fuhrlaender would seem nicely load-matched to the
following load: the WBUR or WGBH nationally-syndicated public radio stations –
their repeater transmitters – or the primary transmitter of WOMR-FM in
Provincetown. The fifth site is more interesting in my humble opinion (an NPR station I co-founded personally). It’s in the Catskill Mountains Qu.
1: Any chance you at NREL, -- or my
friends at Windustry, like Lisa or Wes -- might help me do small wind at 3 or
more of these sites ‘down East’? Also,
is there any chance one of them on a “to be performance tested” basis, where
lots could be learned? I could
get guarantees that none of these broadcasters would prematurely go on-air with
capacity-factors or other pieces of info that’d be all-too-revealing if put
out prematurely. Qu.
2: are there now, -- or will there
be by the end of 2006 – other good competitors in the 30-50KW range, -- some
perhaps with monopole tower design, -- that any of these 5 sites should
consider, perhaps ahead of both Furhlaender and Bergey? Malcolm, Thanks
for your interest in working with NREL on your radio transmitter projects.
While DOE/NREL have sent out competitive Requests-for-Proposals in the
past to work with ‘host sites’ in setting up turbines and evaluating their
performance, there are no such projects planned in the future.
(As you may know, the federal budget for wind research has been severely
cut through Congressional ‘earmarks’.) With
that said, I know that the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative (MTC) works
with renewable projects in MA and they may have interest in funding or
co-funding such projects. I know
that in March of 2005, they started an incentive program for turbines 10 kW and
under. They may be willing to
entertain your idea, which incidentally sounds like a good one to me. My
other thought would be to apply for a 25% grant off of the turbine system
through the US Department of Agriculture. You
need to be an agricultural producer with at least 50% of your income from your
agricultural product or a small rural business to apply.
It is a competitive application process and the grant requirements have
recently changed. I may at the MTC
on March 10th to work with farmers and the USDA on these grants.
Let me know off line if you’d like contact information for this
meeting. Your
second question, there are some other products in the marketplace in this size
range, the Entegrity 15, a 50 kW turbine being sold through www.entegritywind.com.
I have heard that there are Cygnus turbines that are 30/50 kW depending
on whether you want single or three phase turbines. http://www.cygnuswind.com/
There are also used, refurbished turbines on the market, one company is There Good
luck with your project. ************************************************ Glen
Jacobsen and Christina
Hettig I have a perfect spot for a small (40 kw) generator for my home and to sell the excess. I have an anemometer up and running, I have done a bit of research and have an idea on which windmill I will put up, unless something new and better comes along. Problem
is the $60,000+ to start out.... Where can I get a grant, or other free money, to help start out? Or are there other programs, demos, trials, etc out there? I have a perfect site in an area ripe for small farm development but need access to assistance to get going. Glen
and Christina, There is state based incentives that you can find out more information about through Windustry or www.dsireusa.org. And there is the USDA Title 9006 Farm Bill, which incents the use of renewables for agricultural producers or rural small businesses. You can find out more information from their web site http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rd/farmbill2002.html. Other than state incentives, US Farm bill, there is net metering in Minnesota The
other thing to keep in mind is that there is beginning to be a market for the
renewable energy credits, called RECs or green tags.
Where marketing entities will pay you a fixed amount for the kWhs that
your turbine produces that don’t produce pollution.
Windustry would be the best organization for you to contact about all of
these funding opportunities. They
often have meetings, conferences and workshops that are set up to help people
like you find funding sources. |
|||
|
|
Administrator Windbag |
Shuman
Moore Can you please provide me a list of suppliers and general pricing for the range of 10kW thru 500 kW wind turbine generators? Shuman, Below
is a list of manufacturers and the turbine sizes they manufacture: Domestic Bergey
(1 kW, 10 kW): www.bergey.com Southwest
Wind Power (0.4 kW, 0.9 kW, 1.0 kW, 3 kW): www.windenergy.com Aeromax
(0.9 kW):
www.aeromaxenergy.com Jacobs
(20 kW): www.windturbine.net Entegrity
(50 kW): www.entegritywind.com Imports Kestrel
(0.6 kW, 0.8 kW, 1 kW, 2.5 kW): www.kestrelwind.co.za
Proven
(0.6 kW, 2.5 kW, 6 kW, 15 kW): www.provenenergy.co.uk Fuhrlander
(30 kW, 100 kW, 250 kW): www.lorax-energy.com Installed
costs generally range as follows: 1
– 10 kW: $4,000/kW - $6,000/kW >
10 kW – 100 kW (new):
$2,000/kW - $4,000/kW
(used/refurbished): $1,000/kW – 2,000/kW 100
kW – 600 kW: ~ $2,000/kW Some
manufacturers sell direct, others sell through dealers, and some do both.
In
addition to It’s
generally straightforward to get pricing on the equipment.
What is somewhat squishy are the balance of system costs and
installation. For the smaller
turbines, 10 kW and smaller, tower height and type are big variables.
Guyed towers are the least expensive, while free standing towers are
significantly more expensive. ************************************************ Ray Minneapolis, MN Is
it possible, in Ray, The
short answer is “no”. Most
commercial wind projects (using more cost effective MW scale machines) have a
payback period of 5-10 years (for those that can use the production tax credit (PTC))
or 10-15 years (for those that can’t use the PTC).
A one-year payback, especially with a small machine, is unrealistic.
Let’s look at an example. Example:
Net metered 35 kW system
Assumptions: Wind
turbine size: 35 kW (assume an E15
on a 25 meter tower) Installed
cost: $80,000 Lifetime:
20 years Operation
& Maintenance (O&M): $0.01/kWh (I consider this optimistic) Wind
Resource: Average wind speed 7.7 m/s @ 50 meters AGL è
6.9 m/s at 25 meters
(this would be among the best sites on Buffalo Ridge) Retail
Electricity Rate: $0.07/kWh Annual
production: ~ 110,000 kWh per year Annual
Net Income: 110,000 kWh x ($0.07/kWh - $0.06$/kWh) = $6,600 So,
even with several optimistic assumptions, you get about $6600 per year for an
investment of $80,000. The
best wind turbine for under $100,000 depends upon what you are trying to do.
See my answer to Shuman Moore’s question for a list of available
machines. There
are many problems with turbines in residential areas. Many built-up areas have a
35-foot height restriction on towers. This
leads to reduced production due to the lower wind resource closer to the ground,
and increased operations and maintenance due to the turbulence caused by nearby
trees and houses. One small wind
turbine manufacturer recommends a minimum lot size of 1 acre.
This allows for greater exposure to the wind and room to install the
tower. ************************************************ Mike Rivard Minneapolis, MN Thanks for doing questions! 1) I am interested in having you address the current and emerging vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT) technology, in these contexts: small scale, large scale (>1MW) moderate wind (Class 4), heavy wind (Class 7) remote maritime. 2) If possible, please discuss specific vendors. 3) Do VAWT have significant advantages over horizontal axis machines? Mike, I have asked a colleague of mine, Dr. Dale Berg from Sandia National Laboratory to answer your questions. Historically, the Department of Energy has been involved with two national laboratories on wind research. Sandia National Laboratory led the research on vertical axis wind turbines or VAWTs and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) led the research on horizontal axis wind turbines or HAWTs. So Dale is the fellow who knows about VAWTs and he has provided answers for questions 1 and 3. The second question would take a significant amount of time to answer and we’re just not able to spend the time to do this. 1. The only interest in this area that I am aware of is a group of folks (one or more) at TU – Delft in the Netherlands, working under Gijs van Kuik on generating wind energy in the "built" (urban) environment. A grad student named Sander Mertens published a paper on an analytical study of a VAWT in this situation in either the November '04 or November '03 issues of Journal of Solar Energy. He concluded the VAWT is very well suited because it seems to have the potential of additional energy capture in the upslope wind that you may experience near the edge of a roof. A company called McKenzie Bay is actively selling an energy supply system they call the WindStor that utilizes a VAWT and a battery to provide power. I think they claim this can readily be mounted on rooftops, but I'm not sure. I have not done any searches for roof top power systems or wind turbines, so it's very possible there are other applications like this out there. 3. Attractions of VAWTs. They could be considered advantageous for locations with no predominant wind direction, since there is no yaw drive to wear out. They could be easier to erect in remote sites, since there is no heavy equipment to lift to the top of the tower (The Japanese were very interested in this 10 years ago for installation on mountain ridges where it would be extremely difficult to get heavy cranes). The base-mounted generator, transmission and electronics are easy to access in inclement weather (very cold climates, etc.) The Darrieus configuration (egg-beater) and box (straight blade with bottom and top horizonal supports) can readily be built to incorporate blade safety cables to prevent a blade throw in case of blade failure. Blades could be easier and cheaper to build (more material, but usually constant chord and no twist – early blades were extruded aluminum, and FloWind pultruded their composite blades so the labor costs went way down). Comments from Brian Antonich: That said yaw drives typically do not wear out over the lifetime of larger turbines as yawing of turbines is generally not continuous over the life of the machine. If the wind changes direction as much as it might cause a yaw drive to wear out it is probably not a good site to place a wind turbine because the site will have a large amount of turbulent air flow that will be rough on both HAWTs and VAWTs alike. It is the gearbox and bearings of the machine, which experience most of the stress from everyday operations and must be retooled or replaced every so often. The VAWT is advantageous over the HAWT because the gearbox and bearings are closer to the ground, making them easier to work on. But much of the advantage from easier maintenance is mitigated by the fact that a wind turbine will produce significantly better if mounted on a tower because wind speed increases with height. Fatigue is also a major concern for the VAWT because during part of it's revolution there is lift applied to one side of the blade then there is no lift, then lift again. And this is repeated with every revolution of the machine. There is also great turbulence caused downwind of the tower, which causes stress on the machine as the blades pass the downwind side of the machine. These two fatigue issues are major chalenges that VAWTs design engineers must address, making it more challenging to develop a robust machine. This is not to dissuade people from exploring VAWT options, but these design and engineering issues are the major problems hindering the development of a market for VAWTs. ************************************************ Tom P. Abeles What would make the VAWT's attractive in any market, from small, 1kw units to larger, utility systems? Will NREL accept turbines from prospective manufacturers for testing and evaluation? Tom, The bottom line with any turbine system, vertical axis or horizontal axis, is a reliable turbine system that can produce kWhs efficiently at low cost. NREL is beginning to accept the idea of bringing in turbines for testing from prospective manufacturers. Due to the federal budget challenges, we are looking at ways to bring money into the laboratory and provide services that don’t compete with private industry. At this point, we are just starting this and don’t have specific costs. Please contact me directly if you would like to talk about this further. Comments from Brian Antonich: Dealing with the design and engineering issues outlined in the answer to Mike Rivard's question without large increases in manufacturing costs are key to making VAWTs competitive with HAWTs. There are currently no field tested VAWTs on the market. If current designs stand up to the rigors of field testing, revealing that they are as reliable as HAWTs, their acceptance into the market will follow.
This message has been edited. Last edited by: Brian Antonich, |
|||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community | Page 1 2 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Wind Farmers Network Forum
General Items
Expert Q & A
December's Featured Expert: Trudy Forsyth, Small Wind Turbines
